Estate of Gordon B. McLendon, Deceased, Gordon R. McLendon, Jr., Independent Executor - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         

          value of the remainder interest in question on the ground that              
          the known facts surrounding decedent's diagnosis and treatment              
          for esophageal cancer demonstrate that decedent's death was                 
          imminent or predictable on March 5, 1986, thereby justifying a              
          departure from the actuarial tables (under which decedent's                 
          actuarial life expectancy was 15 years).                                    
          In Estate of McLendon v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-459,                 
          66 TCM (CCH) 946, 963, 64 TCM (RIA) 2436, 2455 (slip op. at 51),            
          we decided that the property interests in question should be                
          valued as general partnership interests, as opposed to assignee             
          interests, on the ground that the private annuity agreement                 
          amounted to “a device intended to permit Gordon to transfer his             
          partnership interests to the natural objects of his bounty for              
          less than adequate and full consideration.”  In addition, we                
          sustained respondent's determination that petitioner erred in               
          relying on section 25.2512-5(f) (Table A), Gift Tax Regs., in               
          computing the value of the remainder interest that decedent                 
          transferred pursuant to the private annuity agreement in light of           
          decedent's diminished life expectancy on the date that he entered           
          into the agreement.  Estate of McLendon v. Commissioner, T.C.               
          Memo. 1993-459, 66 TCM (CCH) at 968, 64 TCM (RIA) at 2460 (slip             
          op. at 70).                                                                 
          Upon review of our Memorandum Opinion, the Court of Appeals                 
          for the Fifth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion reversing in            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011