Estate of Philip Meriano, Deceased, Anita Panepinto, Administratrix - Page 29

                                       - 29 -                                         
               On June 25, 1990, Scott filed a status report with the Court           
          which mirrored the status report filed by Latourette on March 19,           
          1990.                                                                       
               On August 6, 1990, Latourette withdrew himself and the                 
          Dilworth firm as counsel for the estate.                                    
               On October 31, 1990, James S. Tupitza (Tupitza) entered his            
          appearance as counsel for the estate.                                       
               In a status report filed with the Court on March 9, 1992,              
          counsel for respondent informed the Court, inter alia:                      
                    4.  Petitioner now wishes to abandon the claims                   
               she is defending (sic) in state court litigation and be                
               allowed a deduction for the entire amounts paid on the                 
               theory it is unlikely the estate will ever collect the                 
               monies ordered to be repaid to the estate.                             
               On November 26, 1993, Tupitza and counsel for respondent               
          filed with the Court a Second Stipulation of Disposition of                 
          Issues (the Second Stipulation) which provided:                             
                    SECOND STIPULATION OF DISPOSITION OF ISSUES                       
               In order to resolve the issues before this Court in the                
               above-captioned case, the parties agree to stipulate                   
               the tentative settlement of all issues raised in the                   
               notice of deficiency upon which this case is based, and                
               all issues raised in the Petition, Answer, and Reply                   
               filed in this case, excepting, however, two issues                     
               concerning the amounts, if any, of deductions allowable                
               for property taken from estate assets by John T. Lynch,                
               Jr. and Edward J. Reardon, respectively.  Those issues                 
               are not settled because the parties do not agree on the                
               legal characterization of the circumstances of such                    
               taking.                                                                
               The parties agree as follows:                                          







Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011