Estate of Philip Meriano, Deceased, Anita Panepinto, Administratrix - Page 34

                                       - 34 -                                         
               that section the issue as to whether a loss arose from                 
               theft is to be determined under the applicable State                   
               law. Weingarten v. Commissioner, 38 T.C. 75, 78 (1962).                
               The leading income tax case of Edwards v. Bromberg, 232                
               F.2d 107, 110-111 (5th Cir. 1956), broadly defines                     
               "theft" as used in section 165(c)(3) as follows:                       
                    * * * the word "theft" is not like "larceny,"                     
                    a technical word of art with a narrowly                           
                    defined meaning but is, on the contrary, a                        
                    word of general and broad connotation,                            
                    intended to cover and covering any criminal                       
                    appropriation of another's property to the                        
                    use of the taker, particularly including                          
                    theft by swindling, false pretenses, and any                      
                    other form of guile * * * [I]t has been long                      
                    and well established that whether a loss from                     
                    theft occurs within the purview of Section                        
                    23(e)(3) [the predecessor to section                              
                    165(c)(3)] of the Internal Revenue Code of                        
                    1939 and the corresponding provisions of                          
                    prior acts, depends upon the law of the                           
                    jurisdiction where it was sustained and that                      
                    the exact nature of the crime, whether                            
                    larceny or embezzlement, of obtaining money                       
                    under false pretenses, swindling or other                         
                    wrongful deprivations of the property of                          
                    another, is of little importance so long as                       
                    it amounts to theft. [Fn. ref. omitted.]                          
               Both parties agree that "theft" is a criminal appropriation            
          of another's property.  The elements of "theft" under                       
          Pennsylvania law are embodied in the Crimes Code, Act. No. 334,             
          section 1.6, 1972 Pa. Laws 1482, at 1612-1613.  Under the Crimes            
          Code, effective June 6, 1973, the intent required is a "thieving            
          state of mind" (citing 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann., sec. 302 (1973));           
          Commonwealth v. Kuykendall, 318 Pa. Super. 429, 465 A.2d 29                 
          (1983); Commonwealth v. Shaffer, 279 Pa. Super. 18, 420 A.2d 722            
          (1980).                                                                     






Page:  Previous  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011