Sheldon R. and Phyllis Milenbach, et al. - Page 14

                                       -14--14-                                          
               Obstacles in the performance of the terms of the agreement             
          were contemplated by the Irwindale MOA, in the following                    
          provisions:                                                                 
                    8.5  If any obstacle is imposed by third parties                  
               (such as litigation, legislation, or failure to                        
               cooperate) it is agreed that both parties pledge good                  
               faith cooperation to overcome any such obstacle.                       
               However, these obstacles will not be construed as a                    
               tolling event for the project itself, nor will it be                   
               construed as a reason to refund any exchange of monies,                
               nor will it be construed as a forfeiture.  It is                       
               further agreed, that both parties will move forward                    
               with the project and mutually work to resolving the                    
               problem.  * * *                                                        
                    8.6  Any third party obstacle will not excuse                     
               either party from proceeding with the project except to                
               the extent ordered by court, e.g. an injunction.                       
          Sections 8.5 and 8.6 did not apply to Irwindale’s obligation to             
          place $10 million in escrow.  If Irwindale failed to fulfill its            
          obligations under the agreement by November 4, 1987, and that               
          failure was not due to third-party obstacles, the Raiders were to           
          be relieved of all obligations under the Irwindale MOA and were             
          entitled to retain $20 million, without a repayment obligation,             
          as consideration for the execution of the Irwindale MOA.                    
               On September 8, 1987, the first of two lawsuits was filed to           
          prevent the transaction contemplated by the Irwindale MOA.  A               
          preliminary injunction that was issued on September 30, 1987, and           
          ultimately a preemptory writ of mandate that was issued on                  
          March 29, 1988, prevented further performance under the Irwindale           
          MOA until an environmental impact report was made concerning the            
          project.  Under the terms of the Irwindale MOA, Irwindale was               




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011