Sheldon R. and Phyllis Milenbach, et al. - Page 23

                                       -23--23-                                          
               Due to the contingent nature of the Raiders’ obligation, an            
          unconditional and enforceable debt did not exist for tax purposes           
          at the times that the $4 million advance and the rent credits               
          were received by the Raiders from the LAMCC.  Thus, we sustain              
          respondent’s determination that the Raiders had income in 1982,             
          1983, 1984, 1985, and 1986 equal to the amount of the rent                  
          credits, and that, in 1984, the Raiders had an additional                   
          $4 million in income from the advance made in 1984.                         
          City of Qakland Lawsuit Settlement                                          
               Petitioners bear the burden of proving that the damages                
          received from Oakland in settlement of the Raiders’ claims were             
          not includable in taxable income.  Rule 142(a); H. Liebes & Co.             
          v. Commissioner, 90 F.2d 932 (9th Cir. 1937), affg. 34 B.T.A. 677           
          (1936).  Petitioners argue that the damages received were to                
          compensate the Raiders for damage to goodwill, and, thus, as a              
          return of capital, they would not be included in the Raiders’               
          gross income.  Respondent contends that the damages were to                 
          compensate the Raiders for lost profits, and, therefore, the                
          Raiders would be required to include the settlement amounts                 
          received in 1988 and 1989 in gross income.                                  
               The parties generally agree on the legal principles that               
          govern the determination of this issue.  “‘[W]hether a claim is             
          resolved through litigation or settlement, the nature of the                
          underlying action determines the tax consequences of the                    
          resolution of the claim.’”  Getty v. Commissioner, 913 F.2d 1486,           




Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011