Elizabeth B. Miller - Page 32

                                       - 32 -                                         

          Stephen, the forgiveness letter addressed to him dated February             
          9, 1987, stated an amount forgiven of $5,000, while the Federal             
          gift tax return filed on behalf of petitioner for 1987 reported a           
          $20,000 gift to Stephen as a result of forgiveness of indebted-             
          ness.  With respect to Robert, the forgiveness letter addressed             
          to him dated February 9, 1987, stated an amount forgiven of                 
          $15,000, while the Federal gift tax return filed on behalf of               
          petitioner for 1987 reported a $20,000 gift to Robert as a result           
          of forgiveness of indebtedness.                                             
               Based on our examination of the entire record in these                 
          cases, we find that petitioners have not established that peti-             
          tioner entered into a bona fide creditor-debtor relationship with           
          either of her sons at the time of the transfers at issue.  We               
          further find that petitioners have failed to satisfy their burden           
          of proving that the transfers at issue constituted loans and not            
          gifts as determined by respondent.  We therefore sustain                    
          respondent's determinations in these cases.                                 
               To reflect the foregoing and petitioners' concessions,                 
                                             Decisions will be entered for            
                                        respondent.                                   












Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  

Last modified: May 25, 2011