Estate of Bessie I. Mueller, Deceased, John S. Mueller, Personal Representative - Page 7

                                                - 7 -                                                  
                  Petitioner acknowledges that equitable recoupment is limited                         
            to defensive use.  However, petitioner argues that it should be                            
            allowed to use equitable recoupment to defend against the                                  
            additional tax that would have been due as a result of our                                 
            valuation of decedent's stock, assuming that respondent had not                            
            allowed the credit for prior transfers in the notice of                                    
            deficiency.  Petitioner would have us apply recoupment against a                           
            hypothetical tax liability on a transaction-by-transaction basis,                          
            regardless of whether there was a valid claim for additional tax                           
            liability against which to defend.  On brief, petitioner                                   
            describes this as an issue of first impression.                                            
                  Respondent takes the position that equitable recoupment can                          
            be used by a taxpayer only as a defensive measure to reduce or                             
            eliminate a taxpayer's actual liability for additional tax.                                
            Respondent argues that once it is clear that the taxpayer has no                           
            additional tax liability, there is no valid claim against which                            
            to defend.  Respondent contends that to allow equitable                                    
            recoupment of time-barred taxes to increase the overpayment that                           
            is already due petitioner is the same as permitting petitioner                             
            affirmatively to collect the time-barred overpayment of tax.                               
                  Respondent's position finds support in Mueller II where we                           
            stated:                                                                                    

                  8(...continued)                                                                      
                  claim can be rendered against the United States, United                              
                  States v. Shaw, 309 U.S. 495 * * *  [In re Greenstreet,                              
                  Inc., 209 F.2d 660, 663 (7th Cir. 1954).]                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011