Estate of Bessie I. Mueller, Deceased, John S. Mueller, Personal Representative - Page 9

                                                - 9 -                                                  
                  reduce the amount of a deficiency recoverable by the                                 
                  Government by the amount of an otherwise barred                                      
                  overpayment of the taxpayer.  * * *                                                  

                  Petitioner correctly points out that none of these cases,                            
            nor any others relied upon by respondent, specifically address                             
            the situation that confronts us; i.e., whether equitable                                   
            recoupment applies where, in the main action, the Court finds                              
            that there is an increase in a taxable item, but because of                                
            another adjustment in the main action, which is in the taxpayer's                          
            favor (the allowance of the credit for prior transfers), there is                          
            no additional tax owed to the Government.  Further examination of                          
            the origin and nature of equitable recoupment is, therefore,                               
            appropriate.                                                                               
                  The doctrine of equitable recoupment in tax cases was first                          
            articulated in Bull v. United States, supra.  The Commissioner                             
            had determined a deficiency in estate tax, which the estate paid.                          
            Thereafter, the Commissioner inconsistently determined that there                          
            was a deficiency in the income tax liability of the estate based                           
            on the same item.  The taxpayer paid the income tax deficiency                             
            and brought suit for refund.  It was ultimately determined that                            
            the additional income tax liability, as determined by the                                  
            Commissioner, was correct, but that the additional estate tax                              
            liability determined by the Commissioner based on the same item,                           
            was incorrect.  The problem was that the additional estate tax                             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011