National Industrial Investors, Inc. - Page 11

                                               - 11 -                                                  


            given to testimony concerning the business purpose of the claimed                          
            expenses.  See DeVenney v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. at 930; Boyle v.                          
            Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-74; Creske v. Commissioner, T.C.                             
            Memo. 1990-318, affd. 946 F.2d 43 (7th Cir. 1991); Porter v.                               
            Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1986-465.                                                         
            (2) Disallowed Current Interest Expenses                                                   
                  Petitioner argues that respondent unreasonably refused to                            
            stipulate before trial the deductibility of interest on a                                  
            $475,000 San Franciso Federal Savings mortgage (the San Francisco                          
            loan) on certain leased property (the Burke property).  However,                           
            petitioner's representatives did not complete and sign the                                 
            stipulation until December 3, 1994--3 days before trial.                                   
            Moreover, petitioner was dilatory in providing evidence to show                            
            NII's complete debt obligations, providing some information on                             
            the loans as late as November 1, 1994.  Cf. DeVenney v.                                    
            Commissioner, 85 T.C. at 933, a case in which respondent was held                          
            not to have unreasonably refused to concede an issue where                                 
            petitioners withheld crucial evidence in the form of witnesses                             
            and their testimony.  Respondent might have conceded the issue                             
            many months prior to trial if petitioner had provided its records                          
            when originally requested.  See Currie v. Commissioner, T.C.                               
            Memo. 1989-23.  In light of such behavior, the Court holds that                            
            respondent was substantially justified in waiting until her                                
            opening argument to concede the deductibility of the San                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011