Ohio Farm Bureau Federation, Inc. - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          1103 (6th Cir. 1984), affg. 78 T.C. 246 (1982); Louisiana Credit            
          Union League v. United States, 693 F.2d 525, 535 (5th Cir.                  
          1982).4                                                                     
               With respect to the uniqueness test, it has been stated                
          that:                                                                       

               Such services as educational and training programs,                    
               legislative lobbying, and institutional advertising                    
               clearly satisfy this uniqueness test, because they                     
               advance the purposes of the * * * [organization] as an                 
               entity in itself.  It is the institutional ends that                   
               must be served if the activity is to be deemed                         
               substantially related.  Educational, legislative, and                  
               advertising services are peculiarly suitable activities                
               for a business league because they further the common                  
               business interest that unites the association’s                        
               members.  * * *  [Louisiana Credit Union League v.                     
               United States, supra at 535; see also Professional Ins.                
               Agents of Mich. v. Commissioner, supra at 1103.]                       

               Petitioner’s stated purpose was generally to aid and assist            
          in the betterment of the conditions and welfare of those engaged            
          in agriculture.  The affidavit upon which petitioner’s tax                  
          exemption was based defined petitioner’s purposes to include “the           
          sponsorship of * * * Purchasing and Marketing cooperatives”.  The           
          primary thrust of petitioner’s activities under the service                 
          contract was to educate Ohio farmers about agricultural                     
          cooperatives in general, and Landmark specifically, and to                  


          4While the cases cited deal with business leagues under sec.                
          501(c)(6), which are associations of persons having common                  
          business interests, we have stated that this substantial                    
          relationship analysis is relevant for purposes of sec. 501(c)(5)            
          agricultural organizations as well.  California Thoroughbred                
          Breeders Association v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-342.                  




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011