- 15 - later, Commercial. Petitioners, nonetheless, have attempted to structure the extinguishment of their debt as capital contributions. Thus, petitioners believe that the form should be respected for Federal tax purposes. Taxpayers may attempt to structure their transactions in such a way as to lessen their tax burden. Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 (1935). Partners may attempt to structure the substance of their transactions by choosing the form of the transactions. Otey v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 312 (1978), affd. per curiam 634 F.2d 1046 (6th Cir. 1980). Ordinarily, "taxpayers are * * * bound by the form of their transaction while the Government can attack that form if it does not represent the substance of the transaction." Newhall Unitrust v. Commissioner, 104 T.C. 236, 243 (1995). Petitioners contend that we should respect the form they have chosen which is reflected in the Agreement. "Whether a debt has been discharged is dependent on the substance of the transactions. Mere formalisms arranged by the parties are not binding in the application of the tax laws." Cozzi v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 435, 445 (1987) (citing Commissioner v. Court Holding Co., 324 U.S. 331 (1945)). Beginning in the summer of 1987, shortly after acquiring Empire, Commercial desired to terminate both its investor and debtor-creditor relationships in the joint ventures. Commercial requested that the investing partners obtain funding to ensurePage: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011