- 9 - (2) those expenses are not disallowed under section 280A(a) because his use of the motor home as the principal place of business for the operations of those activities falls within the exception provided by 280A(c)(1).5 Respondent contends that petitioner is not entitled for 1989 to a deduction for the motor home expenses at issue because he failed to prove that the motor home was used in connection with his rental real estate, rather than personal, activities. Re- spondent further contends that even if the deductions were other- wise allowable by the Code, they are disallowed under section 280A(a) because petitioner has failed to establish that he used the motor home exclusively in connection with his rental real estate activities as required by section 280A(c)(1). Petitioner relies on three documents to support his conten- tion that he used the motor home in connection with his rental real estate activities and claims that those documents corrobo- rate his testimony that he used the motor home as a place to meet with tenants, as a vehicle by which to transport material, as a storage place to store equipment, and as a vehicle to travel to various destinations in Oregon in search of new real estate investments. Two of the documents on which petitioner relies are the 5 Petitioner concedes that he is not entitled to a deduction for 1989 for the reported motor home expenses that he allocated to activities relating to his researching and writing a novel during 1989 and for which he claimed a deduction in Schedule C of his 1989 return.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011