Michael W. and Charlotte S. Phillips - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          there was a disposition of the section 38 property, they incurred           
          no recapture liability under section 47(a) and section 1.47-6,              
          Income Tax Regs.  We disagree.                                              
               Assessment of additional tax liability shown on an amended             
          return does not estop the Commissioner from refusing to recognize           
          the amended return upon subsequent audit.  Courts have repeatedly           
          upheld the Commissioner’s authority to determine a taxpayer’s               
          liability without regard to an amended return that was previously           
          accepted.  Burnet v. Porter, 283 U.S. 230 (1931); Bird v. United            
          States, 241 F.2d 516 (1st Cir. 1957); Polt v. Commissioner,                 
          233 F.2d 893 (2d Cir. 1956), affg. Estate of Dula v.                        
          Commissioner, 23 T.C. 646 (1955); Melahn v. Commissioner, 9 T.C.            
          769 (1947) (Court reviewed).4  As these cases illustrate,                   
          assessment of additional taxes shown on an amended return is                
          routine IRS procedure.5  To ascribe to this essentially                     

          (...continued)                                                              
          offset $118,179 of tax liability.  Thus they have in fact used              
          more of the credit than they acknowledge.  The logic of their               
          position would also require the filing of an amended return for             
          1984 deleting the credit carried back to that year, a point they            
          belatedly admitted by conceding the deficiency for 1984.                    
          4 Contra Daniels Jewelers v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 525,                
          279 F.2d 226 (1960), in which the court was evidently troubled by           
          the Commissioner’s inconsistency in retracting earlier acceptance           
          of the taxpayer’s untimely election only for those years in which           
          the taxpayer’s tax liability would have been decreased by the               
          election.                                                                   
          5 The assessments in this case may have been too hasty.  In                 
          respondent’s brief she explained that the additional tax                    
          liability shown on petitioners’ amended returns for 1985 and 1986           
          was automatically assessed pursuant to sec. 6201(a)(1).  This               
          provision authorizes assessment of taxes shown on the return.               
          But this authority is subject to the restriction on assessment of           
          a deficiency attributable to a partnership item during a period             
                                                             (continued...)           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011