Lawrence J. Polidori - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
          an underpayment, however, respondent cannot rely on a taxpayer's            
          failure to overcome the normal presumption of correctness                   
          attributed to the notice of deficiency.  Otsuki v. Commissioner,            
          53 T.C. 96, 106 (1969).  In general, for purposes of section                
          6653(b), the term "underpayment" has the same meaning as the term           
          "deficiency," as that term is defined in section 6211(a).  Sec.             
          6653(c)(1).                                                                 
               We find that respondent has satisfied this prong of her                
          burden with respect to taxable years 1980 through 1984.                     
          Respondent, however, has not satisfied her burden with respect to           
          the existence of an underpayment for taxable years 1985 and 1986.           
               As to taxable years 1980 through 1983, petitioner's                    
          stipulation that he failed to report gross income from interest             
          on the foreign bank accounts during those years establishes that            
          an underpayment exists with respect to each of those years.  As             
          to taxable years 1984, 1985, and 1986, however, respondent has              
          conceded that petitioner is entitled to deductions for charitable           
          contributions in the amounts of $25,132.24, $64,982.70, and                 
          $65,352.00, respectively.  Accordingly, we address those years in           
          turn.                                                                       
               With respect to taxable year 1984, an underpayment of tax              
          exists because the amount of unreported interest income conceded            
          by petitioner exceeds the amount of the additional charitable               
          deduction conceded by respondent.                                           






Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011