Zahirudeen Premji and Carol M. Premji - Page 28

                                       - 28 -                                         
          seeking an increased deficiency.  Therefore, respondent has the             
          burden of proof on the issue.  Rule 142(a).                                 
               The amounts of both checks would be gross income derived               
          from interest according to the terms of Mr. Premji's arrangement            
          with M&L.  See sec. 61(a)(4); Deputy v. DuPont, 308 U.S. 488, 498           
          (1940); sec. 1.61-1(a), Income Tax Regs.                                    
               An item of gross income shall be included in the taxable               
          year when received by the taxpayer unless under the taxpayer's              
          method of accounting the amount is properly reported in a                   
          different period.  Sec. 451(a).  For a cash receipts and                    
          disbursement method taxpayer, an item is includable in gross                
          income when it is actually or constructively received.  Sec.                
          1.451-1(a), Income Tax Regs.                                                
               Income is constructively received in the taxable year during           
          which it is credited to the taxpayer's account, set apart for him           
          or otherwise made available so that the he may draw upon it at              
          any time.  Sec. 1.451-2(a), Income Tax Regs.  However, income is            
          not constructively received if the taxpayer's control of its                
          receipt is subject to substantial limitations or restrictions.              
          Id.;  see also Hornung v. Commissioner, 47 T.C. 428, 434 (1967).            
               A check that is not subject to substantial restrictions and            
          that the taxpayer could have cashed is income when the check is             
          received.  Kahler v. Commissioner, 18 T.C. 31, 34 (1952) (citing            
          Estate of Spiegel v. Commissioner, 12 T.C. 524, 529 (1949)).  It            
          follows that where the payor lacked funds to make the payment,              




Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011