Thomas Glen Presley - Page 2

                                         -2-                                          
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's 1992                
          Federal income tax in the amount of $2,506 and an accuracy-                 
          related penalty under section 6662(a) in the amount of $501.                
               The issues for decision are:  (1) Whether petitioner is                
          entitled to deductions for dependency exemptions; (2) whether               
          petitioner is entitled to head of household filing status; (3)              
          whether petitioner is entitled to an earned income credit; and              
          (4) whether petitioner is liable for the accuracy-related penalty           
          under section 6662(a).                                                      
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the exhibits received into evidence            
          are incorporated herein by reference.  Petitioner resided in                
          Tampa, Florida, at the time he filed his petition.                          
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               During 1992, petitioner resided in Tampa, Florida.                     
          Petitioner lived apart from his wife, Dorothy Presley, at all               
          times in 1992.                                                              
               On his 1992 Federal income tax return petitioner used head             
          of household filing status and claimed three dependency                     
          exemptions; one each for himself, his son (Thomas Howard                    
          Presley), and his daughter (Leah Marie Presley).  He also claimed           
          an earned income credit in the amount of $1,835.                            
                                       OPINION                                        
               Respondent's determinations are presumed correct, and                  
          petitioner bears the burden of proving otherwise.  Rule 142(a);             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011