Pulsar Components International, Inc. - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         

          its time to (and performed services on behalf of) the operations            
          of these other entities.                                                    
                                       OPINION                                        
               Once again, we are faced with perhaps one of the most                  
          litigated issues in Federal income taxation, the deductibility of           
          compensation paid to shareholders/employees in the setting of a             
          closely held corporation.  In order for employee compensation to            
          be deductible by a cash method taxpayer, the compensation must              
          be:  (1) Paid in the taxable year for services rendered to the              
          taxpayer in the conduct of its trade or business, (2) reasonable            
          in amount, and (3) ordinary and necessary in character.  Sec.               
          162(a)(1); Elliotts, Inc. v. Commissioner, 716 F.2d 1241, 1243              
          (9th Cir. 1983), revg. and remanding T.C. Memo. 1980-282; sec.              
          1.162-7(a), Income Tax Regs.  While each criterion may be at                
          issue from time to time, it is the reasonableness standard that             
          presents the most difficult issue.  As the Court has observed:              
             Inherently there is a natural tension between:                           
             (1) Shareholders/employees who feel that they are entitled to            
             be paid from a corporation's profits, even to the exhaustion             
             thereof, of an amount that reflects their skills and efforts,            
             and (2) a provision in the tax law that conditions the                   
             deductibility of compensation on the concept of                          
             reasonableness.  What is reasonable to the                               
             entrepreneur/employee often may not be to the tax collector.             
             * * * The term "reasonable", however, must reflect the                   
             intrinsic value of employees in the broadest and most                    
             comprehensive sense.  [Mad Auto Wrecking, Inc. v.                        
             Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-153.]                                      
             The parties do not dispute that the Officers' compensation               
          was an ordinary and necessary expense of petitioner.  Thus, we              




Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011