- 20 -                                         
          v. Commissioner, supra.  In analyzing these factors, the Court              
          must carefully scrutinize the facts of a case in which the paying           
          corporation is controlled by the employees to whom the                      
          compensation is paid.  In such a situation, we must be convinced            
          that the purported compensation was paid for services rendered by           
          the employees as opposed to a distribution of earnings to them              
          that the payor could not deduct.  RTS Inv. Corp. v. Commissioner,           
          supra at 650; Paul E. Kummer Realty Co. v. Commissioner, 511 F.2d           
          313, 315-316 (8th Cir. 1975), affg. T.C. Memo. 1974-44; Charles             
          Schneider & Co. v. Commissioner, supra at 152-153; Seven Canal              
          Place Corp. v. Commissioner, 332 F.2d 899 (2d Cir. 1964),                   
          remanding T.C. Memo. 1962-307.                                              
             b.  Employee's Qualifications                                            
             An employee's superior qualifications for his or her position            
          with the business may justify high compensation.  See, e.g.,                
          Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra at 1158;                
          Dave Fischbein Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 59 T.C. 338,              
          352-353 (1972).                                                             
             The Officers are exceptionally qualified for petitioner's                
          business, by virtue of their education, training, experience, and           
          dedication.  They understand and control every aspect of                    
          petitioner's operations.  They are highly motivated and extremely           
          productive employees.  They are the primary reason for                      
          petitioner's success.  The Officers’ outstanding qualifications             
Page:  Previous   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011