Estate of Bert B. Rapp, Deceased, Richard L. Rapp, Executor - Page 19

                                       - 19 -                                         

                  On Part 1 of Schedule M, which calls for a list of                  
             "Property Interests Which Are Not Subject to a QTIP                      
             Election", the executor reported the property specifically               
             devised to Mrs. Rapp, consisting of the couple's residence,              
             the household furnishings, and the decedent's personal                   
             effects, in the aggregate amount of $435,262.50.  On                     
             part 2 of Schedule M, which calls for a list of "Property                
             Interests Which Are Subject to a QTIP Election", the                     
             executor reported $3,444,087.28.  That amount is composed                
             of the value of the assets available for distribution to                 
             the testamentary trust, $5,086,882.60 (i.e., total gross                 
             estate, $5,627,722.06, less assets devised to Mrs. Rapp,                 
             $435,262.50, and assets jointly owned with other                         
             individuals, $105,576.96), less the portion of the property              
             that was not subject to the QTIP election, $802,510.21, and              
             the aggregate nonmarital deductions claimed on the return,               
             $840,285.11.  The marital deduction claimed on the return                
             is $3,683,899.38.  It consists of the total interests                    
             passing to Mrs. Rapp, $3,879,349.78 (i.e., $3,444,087.28                 
             plus $435,262.50) less Federal estate taxes, $156,424, and               
             other death taxes, $39,026.40.                                           
                  In the notice of deficiency issued to petitioner,                   
             respondent determined that petitioner had "failed to fully               







Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011