Estate of Bert B. Rapp, Deceased, Richard L. Rapp, Executor - Page 23

                                       - 23 -                                         

             Mrs. Rapp is not entitled to receive "all the income from                
             the property, payable annually or at more frequent                       
             intervals", as required by section 2056(b)(7)(B)(ii)(I).                 
             Accordingly, as the decedent's 1986 will was originally                  
             written, the property which formed the corpus of the                     
             testamentary trust is not QTIP and is not eligible to be                 
             included in the marital deduction.  Sec. 2056(b)(1).                     
                  The decedent's 1986 will was reformed by the order of               
             the probate court issued on October 31, 1988, quoted above.              
             As reformed, Article Fifth (b) of the decedent's will                    
             directs the trustees to "pay the net income from the corpus              
             of the trust annually or at more frequent intervals to or                
             for the benefit of LAURA B. RAPP, during her lifetime."                  
             The reformed will also expressly authorizes the executor to              
             elect to treat the property held in the trust as QTIP.                   
                  Petitioner argues that the corpus of the trust can be               
             included in the marital deduction for four reasons.  First,              
             petitioner argues that on the date of the decedent's death               
             Mrs. Rapp had an enforceable right under California law to               
             obtain reformation of the decedent's 1986 will as approved               
             by the order of the probate court and that the order of the              
             probate court should be respected for Federal estate tax                 
             purposes.  Second, petitioner argues that the QTIP rules                 







Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011