Dennis P. and Diana C. Raquet - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
               On August 22, 1994, respondent sent a Branerton letter,                
          Branerton Corp. v. Commissioner, 61 T.C. 691 (1974), to  peti-              
          tioner, in which respondent invited petitioner to a conference at           
          respondent's San Jose, California, office.  In the letter,                  
          respondent also suggested that petitioner assemble all documenta-           
          tion which she planned to use to support her case in trial.                 
          Respondent also sent the same Branerton letter, Branerton Corp.             
          v. Commissioner, supra, to petitioner Dennis P. Raquet, except              
          that respondent requested a conference with him on a different              
          date.                                                                       
               Petitioner Dennis P. Raquet did subsequently meet with                 
          respondent.  Petitioner Diana C. Raquet, however, failed to                 
          attend the conference and never furnished respondent with the               
          requested documentation.                                                    
               By means of a notice setting case for trial, served upon               
          petitioners, petitioners were informed that this case was                   
          calendared for trial in Los Angeles, California, with a time and            
          date certain.  This notice included the following paragraphs:               
                    The calendar for that Session will be called at                   
               10:00 A.M. on that date and both parties are expected                  
               to be present at that time and be prepared to try the                  
               case.  YOUR FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL                  
               OF THE CASE AND ENTRY OF DECISION AGAINST YOU.                         











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011