- 10 - the introduction of petitioners' 1982 Federal income tax return which reported petitioners' amount of tax as zero. Alternatively, if respondent were to have the burden of proof, she could satisfy her burden of proof based on deemed admissions. See, e.g., Doncaster v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 334 (1981); Baldwin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1984-119. Pursuant to Rule 90(c), each matter is deemed admitted unless within 30 days after service of the request the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the requesting party either (1) a written answer specifically admitting or denying the matter involved or (2) an objection. Respondent issued requests for admissions on February 8, 1995. Petitioner never responded to respondent's requests for admissions. Thus, even if respondent had the burden of proof, she would have satisfied her burden of proof with respect to the increased deficiency, since respondent's requests are deemed admitted pursuant to Rule 90(c), including an admis- sion that the deficiency for the taxable year 1982 is in the amount of $29,913. Lack of Prosecution With respect to respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution as to petitioner Diana C. Raquet, Rules 123(b) and 149(a) provide as follows: [Rule 123](b) Dismissal: For failure of a petitioner properly to prosecute or to comply with these Rules or any order of the Court or for other cause which the Court deems sufficient, the Court may dismiss a case at any time and enter a decision againstPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011