James E. Redlark and Cheryl L. Redlark - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          the deduction of State income taxes on business income, in                  
          computing adjusted gross income under predecessors of section               
          62(a)(1), has been denied, in contrast to its allowance where net           
          operating losses were involved and the allowance of a deduction             
          for interest on Federal income tax deficiencies under                       
          predecessors of section 62(a)(1).  Tanner v. Commissioner, 45               
          T.C. 145 (1965), affd. per curiam 363 F.2d 36 (4th Cir. 1966).5             
          This treatment has been accepted by respondent insofar as the net           
          operating loss provisions are concerned but not with respect to             
          interest on deficiencies as a business expense under sections 162           
          and 62.  See Rev. Rul. 70-40, 1970-1 C.B. 50.                               
               Respondent argues that Polk v. Commissioner, supra, compels            
          the conclusion that, as a general rule, deficiency interest is              
          not a business expense, and that the cases recognizing a                    
          deduction are unfounded and wrong.  Respondent's argument rests             
          on the following statement of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth            
          Circuit:                                                                    
               Unless it can be said that the failure to properly                     
               evaluate inventories, which form a part of a taxpayer's                
               return, arises because of the nature of the business,                  
               and is ordinarily and necessarily to be expected,                      
               interest on a deficiency assessment does not arise out                 
               of the ordinary operation of the business and may not                  
               be deducted.  [Polk v. Commissioner, 276 F.2d at 603;                  
               fn. ref. omitted.]                                                     
               This statement is rooted in the requirement that deficiency            


          In Maxcy v. Commissioner, 26 T.C. 526 (1956), and Estate of                 
          Broadhead v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1966-26, affd. 391 F.2d 841           
          (5th Cir. 1968), we sustained the disallowance of the deduction             
          for State income taxes on the ground of failure of proof as to              
          the requisite business connection.                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011