James E. Redlark and Cheryl L. Redlark - Page 32

                                       - 32 -                                         
          Maxcy v. Commissioner, supra at 527, the Court held that the                
          taxpayer failed to prove that he could compute an NOL by                    
          deducting from his gross income a claimed business expense of               
          interest on underpayments of personal income tax.  In Aaron v.              
          Commissioner, supra at 1376, the Court sustained the                        
          Commissioner's determination that the taxpayer could not compute            
          an NOL by deducting the State income taxes that he claimed were             
          related to his business income.  According to the Court, the                
          phrase "attributable to" meant that an expense had to bear a                
          "direct relation" to the individual's business.  Id.                        
               In Rev. Rul. 70-40, 1970-1 C.B. 50, the Commissioner                   
          reconsidered and reversed her position in Rev. Rul. 58-142,                 
          supra, insofar as it held that State income taxes, deficiency               
          interest, and litigation expenses related to a taxpayer's                   
          business income were nondeductible nonbusiness expenses for                 
          purposes of determining an NOL.2  Prior to her reconsideration,             
          this and other Courts had consistently rejected that position.              
          First, in Standing v. Commissioner, supra at 795, this Court held           
          that the taxpayer's deficiency interest and professional fees               
          were deductible as business expenses under sections 22(n)(1) and            


          2 At the same time, the Commissioner reaffirmed her view                    
          that these expenses were not deductible in computing AGI.  The              
          Commissioner explained her inconsistency in these two views by              
          noting that the legislative history of sec. 172(d)(4) contained             
          no language comparable to the language in the legislative history           
          of former sec. 62(a)(1) which stated that expenses deductible in            
          arriving at AGI must be "directly incurred" in carrying on a                
          trade or business, and that State income taxes are not directly             
          incurred.  Rev. Rul. 70-40, 1970-1 C.B. 50, 50-51.                          




Page:  Previous  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011