James E. Redlark and Cheryl L. Redlark - Page 35

                                       - 35 -                                         
          the valuation of livestock is ordinary and necessary to the                 
          conduct of a livestock business because people may disagree on              
          the value of livestock.  Id. at 603.                                        
               Shortly thereafter, this Court reached a result consistent             
          with Polk and Standing in our Court-reviewed opinion in Reise v.            
          Commissioner, 35 T.C. 571 (1961), affd. 299 F.2d 380 (7th Cir.              
          1962).  We held in Reise that State income taxes, deficiencies in           
          State income taxes, interest on State and Federal income taxes,             
          and litigation expenses relating primarily to an individual's               
          business income were deductible as ordinary and necessary                   
          business expenses in computing an NOL carryback.  We carefully              
          reviewed the relevant statutes, the legislative history, the                
          administrative interpretations of these provisions, and the                 
          caselaw (including Polk, Standing, Maxcy, and Aaron).  We                   
          concluded that Standing and Polk are "sound and correct", and               
          Aaron is not.  Id. at 579.  We applied the rationale of Polk and            
          Standing, and we overruled Aaron as an improper and incorrect               
          construction of section 122(d)(5) of the 1939 Code.4  Id. at 579.           
               This and other Courts have steadfastly followed the judicial           
          reasoning that we enunciated in Reise, Polk, and Standing.                  
          Indeed, in Estate of Broadhead v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo                   
          1966-26, affd. 391 F.2d 841 (5th Cir. 1968), we were obliged to             
          distinguish Standing, in holding that the taxpayer could not                
          claim a business expense deduction for interest on his Federal              


          4 The text of sec. 122(d)(5) of the 1939 Code is virtually                  
          identical to the text of sec. 172(d)(4).                                    




Page:  Previous  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011