Paul A. Rendina and Janet Mae Rendina - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         

               WSAI5          4/06/89        53,000                                   
               On February 27, 1987, the Navars lent $10,000 to WSAI, and             
          received the following note:                                                

               Entity         Date           Amount                                   
               WSAI           2/26/87        $10,000                                  

               With the exception of one of the Foss notes, each new note             
          reflected a rollover of the obligation on the prior note.  For              
          the months of January, February, March, and April 1989, all                 
          interest payments due on the notes to the Fosses, Navars, and               
          Posas were made in the name of WSAI.6                                       
               In 1988, 16 of the 18 units were sold, two of which were               
          purchased by Ackerman.  The stated purchase prices and dates of             
          purchase for the 16 units were as follows:                                  
                                                  Purchase       Purchase             
               Purchaser                Condo     Date           Price                
               Thomas J. &              Unit A,   9-16-88        $65,9007             
               Michelle L. Ackerman     Bldg. A                                       

          5See supra note 4.                                                          
          6The record does not indicate the source of the funds used                  
          to make the first 4 months’ interest payments in 1989.                      
          7Ackerman borrowed $100,000 to purchase the two condominium                 
          units, and testified that he performed approximately $15,000                
          worth of work on each of them.  While the statutory conveyance              
          fee for each of the units was $65.90, representing 1 percent of             
          the purchase price, the way we decide this case does not require            
          a factual determination of how much Ackerman actually paid for              
          each of the units.  We do find that the stated purchase prices              
          for the 14 units purchased by the unrelated parties were the                
          actual purchase prices.                                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011