E.W. Richardson - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
               After concessions,1 the issues for decision are:  (1)                  
          Whether Richardson Investments, Inc. (Investments), made an                 
          unauthorized change in method of accounting.  We hold it did.               
          (2) Whether Investments’ method of inventory accounting clearly             
          reflected income.  We hold it did not.  (3) Whether respondent              
          abused her discretion in determining that Investments should                
          define its items of inventory for dollar-value LIFO purposes by             
          model code.  We hold she did not.  (4) Whether Investments’                 
          claimed deductions arising from the ownership and operation of an           
          airplane are allowable.  We hold that such deductions are                   
          allowable.                                                                  
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated.  The stipulated                
          facts and the accompanying exhibits are incorporated into our               
          findings by this reference.  Petitioner, E.W. Richardson, resided           
          in Albuquerque, New Mexico, on the date the petition was filed.             
               During the taxable years 1988 and 1989, petitioner was the             
          sole shareholder of Investments, a subchapter S corporation.                
          Investments was incorporated under the laws of the State of New             
          Mexico on February 21, 1961.  Investments elected the status of             
          an S corporation on January 1, 1986.  Prior to 1986, Investments            
          owned three subsidiaries:  Rich Ford Sales, Rich Ford Leasing,              


          1    Pursuant to a stipulation of agreed adjustments and a                  
          concession on brief by respondent, the parties resolved all but             
          four of the issues raised by the pleadings.  We leave it to the             
          parties to include these adjustments in their Rule 155                      
          computations.                                                               



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011