Robert Schelble and Susan Schelble - Page 8

                                           - 8 -                                             
          Dacey v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-187; Rev. Rul. 68-498,                      
          1968-2 C.B. 377.                                                                   
                The issue of whether an independent insurance agent's                        
          "extended earnings" are subject to self-employment tax was most                    
          recently addressed by this Court in Koszewa v. Commissioner, T.C.                  
          Memo. 1994-458.  In Koszewa, the taxpayer signed the same "Career                  
          Agent's Agreement" with the same Companies as petitioner.  In                      
          Koszewa, we concluded that there was a sufficient nexus between                    
          the extended earnings payments received by the taxpayer and the                    
          trade or business activity in which he was engaged while                           
          associated with the Companies.  Thus, the extended earnings                        
          received by the taxpayer in Koszewa were subject to the self-                      
          employment tax.                                                                    
                Applying the Newberry nexus standard and the reasoning used                  
          in Koszewa to petitioner, we conclude that the extended earnings                   
          payments received by him during 1989, 1990, and 1991 related to                    
          the trade or business activity in which he was engaged while                       
          associated with the Companies.  First, to qualify for such                         
          payments, petitioner had to be associated with the Companies for                   
          a certain number of years, have a certain number of policies in                    
          place at the time of termination, and refrain from direct compe-                   
          tition with the Companies.  All of those requirements relate to                    
          petitioner's original business with the Companies.  Second, the                    
          amount of such payments was calculated by reference to the                         
          renewal commissions that petitioner earned in his final months                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011