Robert Schelble and Susan Schelble - Page 11

                                           - 11 -                                            
          petitioner's payments herein and the payments at issue in                          
          Milligan.                                                                          
                The Court of Appeals in Milligan v. Commissioner, supra at                   
          1098, found that "To be taxable as self-employment income,                         
          earnings must be tied to the quantity or quality of the                            
          taxpayer's prior labor, rather than the mere fact that the                         
          taxpayer worked or works for the payor."  Here, both the quantity                  
          and quality of petitioner's labor directly affected the amount of                  
          his extended earnings payments.                                                    
                Unlike the termination payments to the taxpayer in Milligan,                 
          petitioner's extended earnings were based in part on how long he                   
          had been in service for the Companies.  The percentage of                          
          petitioner's renewal service fees which would be paid to him as                    
          "extended earnings" was determined by how many years he had                        
          served as an agent to the Companies.  To qualify for the lowest                    
          percentage of "extended earnings" petitioner had to have repre-                    
          sented the Companies for at least 5 years.  Additionally, peti-                    
          tioner had to have 400 or more American Family mutual casualty                     
          fire and health policies in force and at least 50 American                         
          Standard policies in force at the time the Agreement was                           
          terminated in order to qualify for extended earnings.  Thus, the                   
          extended earning payments received by petitioner were tied to the                  
          quantity, quality, and duration of his prior labor.                                
                Another distinction is that the termination payments in                      
          Milligan v. Commisisoner, supra at 1099:                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011