- 12 - After an audit of Martin and petitioner’s joint Federal income tax returns for 1981 through 1984, respondent charged Martin with receipt of unreported embezzlement income as follows: Year Embezzlement Income 1981 $ 415,169 1982 3,269,485 1983 5,375,207 1984 1,798,305 Respondent also disallowed for 1983 the claimed $600,000 Keogh deduction.2 The schedule below reflects the taxable income as reflected by Martin and petitioner on their joint Federal income tax returns for 1981 through 1984 and the corrected taxable income as determined by respondent as a result of the omitted embezzlement income, the disallowed Keogh deduction, and other adjustments: Taxable Corrected Year Income Reported Taxable Income 1981 $ (3,467) $ 411,777 1982 50,227 3,330,913 1983 240,751 6,256,003 1984 (223,789) 1,574,385 Respondent further determined additions to tax for fraud for each year based on the above omitted embezzlement income, and respondent determined the addition to tax for fraud for 1983 also 2 Petitioner has conceded certain other adjustments, and petitioner acknowledges that, should petitioner be found eligible for innocent spouse treatment, a Rule 155 computation is required with regard to the conceded adjustments.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011