- 20 -
Martin's embezzlement activity and to the erroneously claimed
Keogh deduction.
Because of our conclusion as to petitioner’s status as an
innocent spouse, petitioner’s alternative argument that the fraud
additions to tax that are at issue in this case should not apply
to petitioner is moot, and we decline to address that alternative
argument.
Decision will be entered
under Rule 155.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Last modified: May 25, 2011