- 13 - OPINION The principal issue presented for decision in the instant case is whether petitioners must include in their income for taxable year 1987 the $190,000 payment1 petitioner received from the partnership during 1987. Petitioners bear the burden of proof. Rule 142(a). Petitioners contend that the $190,000 payment represents a guaranteed payment that is includable in their income in the years that the partnership accrued the management fees payable to petitioner. The period of limitations on assessment has expired for the taxable years in which the accruals would have been reportable by petitioners. Respondent contends that, even assuming that the $190,000 payment represents a guaranteed payment, petitioner had adopted the cash method of accounting to report the payment, and, therefore, the payment is includable in petitioners’ income in the year of receipt. We agree with petitioners. For purposes of respondent’s argument on brief, respondent assumes that the $190,000 payment constitutes a guaranteed payment and does not dispute petitioner’s contention that it is a guaranteed payment. Although respondent has not expressly 1 We sometimes refer to a $190,000 payment and sometimes to management fees. The term “190,000 payment” denotes the total of the accrual management fees that were paid to petitioner during 1987.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011