Leon L. Sicard and Eleanor Sicard - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
               If, under the statutes, income must be reported in a                   
               certain way and the taxpayer erroneously reports it in                 
               a different way, such treatment is not binding upon                    
               either the taxpayer or the Commissioner.  The taxpayer                 
               has made an error * * * which error, in the absence of                 
               estoppel, is subject to correction if timely challenged                
               by either the taxpayer or Commissioner * * *.[3]                       
               Respondent does not argue that petitioners are bound to                
          report the $190,000 guaranteed payment in the year of receipt by            
          the “duty of consistency” doctrine, nor is it contended that the            
          mitigation provisions of sections 1311-1314 or the extended                 
          period of limitations provided by section 6501(c) and (e), are              
          applicable.  Petitioners’ mistaken omission of the management               
          fees from their returns for the years in which they were included           
          in cost of goods sold by the partnership does not prevent them              
          from obtaining the benefit of the bar of the statute of                     
          limitations as applicable to the instant case.                              


          3                                                                           
               We note that generally it is held that, where a taxpayer               
          erroneously omits income in a year with respect to which                    
          assessment is barred by the statute of limitations, the                     
          Commissioner may not require it to be included in income in a               
          later year simply to prevent it from escaping tax.  United States           
          v. Wilkins, 385 F.2d 465, 469 (4th Cir. 1967); Welp v. United               
          States, 201 F.2d 128, 131-133 (8th Cir. 1953); Commissioner v.              
          Frame, 195 F.2d 166, 167 (3d Cir. 1952) affg. 16 T.C. 600 (1951);           
          Commissioner v. Mnookin’s Estate, 184 F.2d 89, 92-93 (8th Cir.              
          1950) affg. 12 T.C. 744 (1949); Ross v. Commissioner, 169 F.2d              
          483, 492 (1st Cir. 1948), revg. and remanding a Memorandum                  
          Opinion of this Court dated Feb. 10, 1947; Fruehauf Trailer Co.             
          v. Commissioner, 42 T.C. 83, 107 (1964), affd. 356 F.2d 975 (6th            
          Cir. 1966).  “The courts hold that neither income nor deductions            
          may be taken out of the proper accounting period for the benefit            
          of the Government or the taxpayer.”  Commissioner v. Mnookin’s              
          Estate, supra at 92.                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011