Theodore Souris, P.C., A Dissolved Corporation, and Theodore Souris, As Successor in Interest of Theodore Souris, P.C. - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

          The principal issue presented is whether the petitioner                     
          corporation's $171,476 "employer reversion", section                        
          4980(c)(2)(A), which is concededly includable in its gross                  
          income, may be offset by a section 162(a)(1) deduction in the               
          same amount for compensation paid to its sole stockholder-                  
          employee.  The facts have been stipulated.                                  
               In 1981, Theodore Souris, an attorney, was a partner in the            
          Detroit, Michigan, law firm of Bodman, Longley & Dahling.  On               
          April 16, 1981, petitioner Theodore Souris, P.C., was                       
          incorporated under the laws of Michigan.  It was wholly owned by            
          Mr. Souris.  Also on that day, Mr. Souris assigned his                      
          partnership interest to petitioner corporation (the corporation             
          or the P.C.), and the law firm consented to its admission as a              
          partner in substitution for Mr. Souris.  An appendix to the                 
          partnership agreement sets forth special provisions regarding               
          professional corporations as partners.  Among other things, the             
          appendix provides that no one other than the individual attorney            
          "shall at any time be a stockholder, director, officer or lawyer            
          employee of the professional corporation", that "the professional           
          corporation shall be entitled, without deduction, to all the                
          receipts of the individual attorney," and that "the individual              
          attorney shall guarantee to the Firm that the professional                  


          1(...continued)                                                             
          the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue.                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011