Theodore Souris, P.C., A Dissolved Corporation, and Theodore Souris, As Successor in Interest of Theodore Souris, P.C. - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         

          the payment in his own income tax return, rather than in the                
          return of the corporation, as a "reversion".  The real intent of            
          the payment to Mr. Souris is found in his agreement with the                
          corporation, which existed long before the events with which we             
          are concerned here.  We conclude that the payment from the                  
          corporation to Mr. Souris is deductible by the corporation as               
          reasonable compensation under section 162(a)(1).                            
                                                                                     
               Finally, a word about "employer reversion", which is defined           
          in section 4980(c)(2), and which is treated by both parties as              
          applicable here in connection with whether the employer reversion           
          is includable in the gross income of the employer for purposes of           
          the income tax.  However, section 4980 literally relates solely             
          to an excise tax.  Subsection (a) of section 4980 now imposes "a            
          tax of 20 percent of the amount of any employer reversion from a            
          qualified plan."  And in defining the term "employer reversion"             
          subsection (c) begins with the words "For purposes of this                  
          section".  Yet, as just indicated, both parties in this case                
          treat the section 4980(c)(2) definition as applicable here for              
          purposes of the income tax.  Indeed this Court has so indicated.            
          Lee Engineering Supply Co. v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 189, 194               
          (1993); cf. S. Rept. 1567, 75th Cong. 3d Sess. at 24 (1938),                
          1939-1 C.B. (Part 2) 779, 796.                                              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011