William and Joan Spears - Page 60

                                       - 60 -                                         
               1.  The Grounds for Petitioners' Underpayments                         
               Section 6659 does not apply to underpayments of tax that are           
          not "attributable to" valuation overstatements.  See McCrary v.             
          Commissioner, supra; Todd v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 912 (1987),              
          affd. 862 F.2d 540 (5th Cir. 1988).  To the extent taxpayers                
          claim tax benefits that are disallowed on grounds separate and              
          independent from alleged valuation overstatements, the resulting            
          underpayments of tax are not regarded as attributable to                    
          valuation overstatements.  Krause v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 132,             
          178 (1992) (citing Todd v. Commissioner, supra), affd. sub nom.             
          Hildebrand v. Commissioner, 28 F.3d 1024 (10th Cir. 1994).                  
          However, when valuation is an integral factor in disallowing                
          deductions and credits, section 6659 is applicable.  See Illes v.           
          Commissioner, 982 F.2d 163, 167 (6th Cir. 1992), affg. T.C. Memo.           
          1991-449; Gilman v. Commissioner, 933 F.2d 143, 151 (2d Cir.                
          1991) (section 6659 addition to tax applies if a finding of lack            
          of economic substance is "due in part" to a valuation                       
          overstatement), affg. T.C. Memo. 1989-684; Masters v.                       
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-197, affd. without published                  
          opinion 70 F.3d 1262 (4th Cir. 1995); Harness v. Commissioner,              
          T.C. Memo. 1991-321.                                                        
               Farrell argues that the disallowance of the claimed tax                
          benefits was not "attributable to" a valuation overstatement.               
          According to Farrell, the tax benefits were disallowed because              






Page:  Previous  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011