State Police Association of Massachusetts - Page 34

                                       - 34 -                                         
          competitive or promotional efforts typical of commercial                    
          endeavors.                                                                  
               We conclude that the facts of Suffolk County and NCAA are              
          distinguishable from those of the instant case.  In Suffolk                 
          County, although a large percentage of the organization's annual            
          vaudeville shows' gross receipts derived from the sale of                   
          advertising for the shows' program guides, we defined the                   
          taxpayer's trade or business for purposes of section 513 as the             
          annual vaudeville shows.6  Suffolk County antedated United States           
          v. American College of Physicians, 475 U.S. 834 (1986).  In                 
          Suffolk County, we did not segregate the business of the annual             
          vaudeville shows from the publishing of the shows' program                  
          guides, nor did we segregate the publishing of material relating            
          to the shows from the business of selling and publishing                    
          advertising space in the program guides.  Accordingly, we                   
          conclude that Suffolk County is not dispositive of the instant              
          case.                                                                       
               In NCAA, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals defined the                
          taxpayer's trade or business for purposes of section 513 as "the            


          6    See Suffolk County Patrolmen’s Association v. Commissioner,            
          77 T.C. 1314, 1319 (1981) ("Although petitioner does dispute that           
          the annual vaudeville show constituted a trade or business, its             
          primary argument herein is that even if the show was a trade or             
          business it was not 'regularly carried on.'"); id. at 1322 n.10             
          ("Respondent maintains, and we agree, that the actual performance           
          of the vaudeville show and the solicitation of advertising for              
          the program guide are a single inseparable activity.").                     




Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011