Lee R. Stevens - Page 10

                                        -10-                                          
          S. Ct. 647, 652-653 (1996); Rossman v. Commissioner, 46 F.3d 1144           
          (9th Cir. 1995), affg. without published opinion T.C. Memo. 1993-           
          351; Richards v. Commissioner, 37 F.3d 587 (10th Cir. 1994), affg.          
          T.C. Memo. 1993-102; Allen v. Commissioner, 23 F.3d 406 (6th Cir.           
          1994), affg. without published opinion 99 T.C. 475 (1992); Davison          
          v. Commissioner, 9 F.3d 1538 (2d Cir. 1993), affg. without                  
          published opinion T.C. Memo. 1992-709; Galuska v. Commissioner, 5           
          F.3d 195 (7th Cir. 1993), affg. 98 T.C. 661 (1992); Patronik-Holder         


               6(...continued)                                                        
               refund shall be allowed or made of any portion of the tax              
               unless the Tax Court determines as part of its decision that           
               such portion was paid--                                                
                        (A) After the mailing of the notice of deficiency,            
                        (B) Within the period which would be applicable               
               under section 6511(b)(2), (c), or (d), if on the date of               
               the mailing of the notice of deficiency a claim had been               
               filed (whether or not filed) stating the grounds upon which            
               the Tax Court finds that there is an overpayment, or                   
                         (C) Within the period which would be applicable              
               under section 6511(b)(2), (c), or (d), in respect of any               
               claim for refund filed within the applicable period                    
               specified in section 6511 and before the date of the                   
               mailing of the notice of deficiency--                                  
                             (i)  which had not been disallowed                       
                             before that date,                                        
                             (ii) which had been disallowed before                    
                             that date and in respect of which a                      
                             timely suit for refund could have been                   
                             commenced as of that date, or                            
                             (iii) in respect of which a suit for                     
                             refund had been commenced before that                    
                             date and within the period specified in                  
                             section 6532.                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011