Dennis J. Tang and Alice Shu-Ling Tang - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          introduced at trial.  Two checks (one from October 9, 1989,5 in             
          the amount of $10,000, and one from March 12, 1990, in the amount           
          of $10,000) were made out to Dr. Chan as payee.  The second of              
          these checks has written in the "Description" area "Reimburse -             
          Training".  Dr. Chan claims that he had, on these two occasions,            
          paid petitioner with a personal check, and then Shanghai reim-              
          bursed him for the cost of the lessons.  Five checks, totaling              
          $65,000, were made out to Yao Min Ting.  The first check, dated             
          April 9, 1990, was in the amount of $15,000, and included the               
          notation "Business Consulting" in the description line of the               
          check.  The second check, dated May 9, 1990, was in the amount of           
          $15,000 was also described as a "Business Consulting" fee.  The             
          third check, dated June 9, 1990, was for $15,000 and was                    
          described as a "Business Consulting Fee".  The fourth check,                
          dated November 30, 1990, was for $10,000 and was described as a             
          "Consultation" fee.  The fifth check, dated January 31, 1991, was           
          for $10,000 and was again described as a "Consultation" fee.                
          Three checks, totaling $25,600, were made out to Ting Yao Min.              
          The first, on June 25, 1990, was for $15,000 and was described as           
          a business consultation fee.  The second dated August 8, 1990,              
          was for $10,000.  The third check, dated September 17, 1990, was            
          for $600 and was described as a consultation fee.  One wire                 



          5We note that the 1989 tax year is not herein in issue.                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011