Dennis J. Tang and Alice Shu-Ling Tang - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          length.  We cannot accept petitioner's uncorroborated testimony             
          to this effect.  Petitioner's testimony was not forthright, and             
          we found his testimony not credible.  In contrast, Dr. Chan                 
          credibly testified that it was petitioner who requested that he             
          pay for the lessons, set the amount, and directed to whom the               
          checks should be made payable.  We accept his testimony and find            
          that the weight of the evidence supports this conclusion.                   
               Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for an               
          accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) for a substantial            
          understatement in tax for the 1990 tax year.  A substantial                 
          understatement of tax exists when the amount of the understate-             
          ment for the taxable year exceeds the greater of 10 percent of              
          the tax required to be shown on the return or $5,000.  Sec.                 
          6662(d)(1).  An underpayment equals the excess of the tax imposed           
          over the amount shown as tax on the taxpayer's return, plus the             
          amounts not shown but previously assessed or collected, less                
          rebates.  Sec. 6664(a).  Petitioners suggest no reasonable cause            
          for this understatement, nor do we find that one exists.  Because           
          we hold that petitioners failed to report the amounts paid by               
          Dr. Chan and Shanghai Clinic to Yao Min Ting, Ting Yao Min, and             
          Tang Chiang Ting on account of services petitioner rendered and             
          petitioners reported tax due on their 1990 Federal tax return of            
          only $8, petitioners are liable for the penalty under section               
          6662.                                                                       
                                                  Decision will be entered            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011