James H. Upchurch - Page 16

                                        - 16 -                                          
          for a well-educated person like petitioner, who had not been                  
          significantly involved in businesses or investments prior to that             
          time.  A reasonable person in these circumstances would be more               
          concerned about the bona fides of the transaction.  Once                      
          petitioner was at least $3,000 ahead from the refund of his 1980,             
          1981, and 1982 taxes and reductions in 1983 tax, he lacked                    
          interest in the transaction and its ultimate outcome.  This                   
          reflects that petitioner's primary, if not sole, motivation for               
          involvement in the transaction was the tax benefit received on                
          the front end, rather than an interest in income or retirement                
          income sources.                                                               
               Petitioner contends that he reasonably relied on his friend,             
          Mr. Chalich (the salesman and coinvestor); his coworker, Mr.                  
          Pecha (the chemistry teacher and coinvestor); and Mr. Shriver                 
          (the accountant connected with the promoter/sales organization).              
          There is no allegation that Mr. Chalich had any expertise in                  
          energy devices or the economics of the transaction in question.               
          Other than their long-term friendship, which has no bearing on                
          this issue, petitioner has not shown that it was reasonable to                
          rely on Mr. Chalich.                                                          
               Concerning Mr. Pecha, he was a chemistry teacher and                     
          involved in a wrestling program with petitioner.  In addition,                
          Mr. Pecha also invested in the same Saxon energy-device leasing               
          transaction as petitioner.  Although petitioner relied on Mr.                 
          Pecha's educational and teaching background with respect to the               




Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011