John Van Heemst - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          Giddio v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 1530, 1533 (1970); Schroeder v.             
          Commissioner, 40 T.C. 30, 33 (1963).                                        
               We note that petitioner complains, inter alia, that                    
          respondent did not provide him with copies of Pieces of Eight’s             
          books and records.  Petitioner further claims that he was                   
          prevented from seeking records of Pieces of Eight by the July               
          1991 order restraining him from coming on or around the business.           
          The record shows, and petitioner admits on brief, that he                   
          provided all of the records of Pieces of Eight to respondent’s              
          agent during the audit, although he claims that he did so on the            
          instructions of Pieces of Eight.  Those records consisted of                
          seven boxes of documents and were supplied to the agent at Pieces           
          of Eight’s place of business during April 1991.  Although                   
          petitioner maintained the books and records of Pieces of Eight,             
          he neither participated in the process of reconstructing its                
          taxable income nor met with respondent’s agent at the conference            
          at which the records were reviewed, although he had been notified           
          of it.  After the reconstruction was completed, respondent turned           
          the records over to Ms. Murphy and Mr. Louwers.  Ms. Murphy took            
          the records to petitioner’s store in Sarasota.  Although                    
          petitioner contends that the records have disappeared, the                  
          problem seems to be one of his own making, and we find his                  
          complaint that respondent did not provide him with the records of           
          Pieces of Eight to be without merit.                                        






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011