- 20 -                                         
               non-taxable receipts, and cash on hand may establish                   
               the existence of unreported income.  [United States v.                 
               Citron, 783 F.2d 307, 310 (2d Cir. 1986).]                             
               Formal opening net worth statements are not required                   
          provided the evidence "'shows the extent of any contribution                
          which beginning resources or a diminution of resources over time            
          could have made to expenditures.'"  Petzoldt v. Commissioner,               
          supra at 694-695 (quoting Taglianetti v. United States, 398 F.2d            
          558, 565 (1st Cir. 1968), affd. 394 U.S. 316 (1969)).  To carry             
          his burden of proof, petitioner must show that the expenditures             
          in question were made from some nontaxable source of funds, such            
          as loans, gifts, or assets on hand at the beginning of the                  
          period.  DeVenney v. Commissioner, supra at 931.  Alternatively,            
          petitioner may show that the expenditures were allowable business           
          expenses, in which case they would offset the income presumed to            
          have been received by petitioner.  Curry v. Commissioner, T.C.              
          Memo. 1991-102.                                                             
               Petitioner argues that the expenditures identified by                  
          respondent were business expenses of Pieces of Eight or were                
          loans or repayments made by it to himself or other related                  
          businesses and that any loans Pieces of Eight made were repaid.             
          Petitioner relies on his testimony and charge account statements            
          to establish his claim with respect to the business expenses.               
          However, we found petitioner’s testimony vague and replete with             
          unsupported conclusions, and, based on our observation of his               
Page:  Previous   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011