John Van Heemst - Page 37

                                       - 37 -                                         
          acting pursuant to a purported power of attorney given by Michael           
          Van Heemst.  During this time, however, it appears that there was           
          in existence a sale agreement, dated September 3, 1990, pursuant            
          to which petitioner, as transferee for a company to be                      
          incorporated, purported to purchase the assets of Pieces of Eight           
          from Michael Van Heemst and which petitioner kept hidden in his             
          files.  Petitioner, moreover, did not assist the agent in                   
          reconstructing the taxable income of Pieces of Eight for the                
          years in issue, even though he was its bookkeeper.  Making false            
          and inconsistent statements to the Commissioner’s agents during             
          the course of their examinations is a badge of fraud, as is                 
          failure to cooperate with the agents.  Grosshandler v.                      
          Commissioner, 75 T.C. 1, 20 (1980).                                         
               Furthermore, we consider petitioner’s testimony at trial,              
          which we found to be at times vague, evasive, inconsistent, and             
          incredible.  “Although mere refusal to believe the taxpayer’s               
          testimony does not discharge the Commissioner’s burden, * * * the           
          lack of credibility of the taxpayer’s testimony, the                        
          inconsistencies in his testimony, and his evasiveness on the                
          stand are heavily weighted factors in considering the fraud                 
          issue.”  Toussaint v. Commissioner, 743 F.2d 309, 312 (5th Cir.             
          1984), affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-25.                                            
               Petitioner relies on a memorandum from respondent’s Criminal           
          Investigation Division declining to accept referral of                      
          petitioner’s case for criminal prosecution.  That petitioner’s              




Page:  Previous  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011