Anne S. and Charles G. Vick - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         

               After a concession by respondent, the issues for decision              
          are:  (1) Whether petitioners failed to report miscellaneous                
          income of $3,341 received from the Shaklee Corp. (the                       
          corporation) in 1990, and (2) whether petitioners are entitled to           
          trade or business deductions under section 162 for cost of goods            
          sold.2                                                                      
               Some of the facts were stipulated, and those facts, with the           
          annexed exhibits, are so found and are incorporated herein by               
          reference.  At the time the petition was filed, petitioners'                
          legal residence was Memphis, Tennessee.                                     
               During 1990, Charles G. Vick (petitioner) was self-employed            
          selling the products of the corporation.  Petitioners received              
          $3,341 from the corporation during 1990, and that amount was                
          reported by the corporation as a payer to the Internal Revenue              
          Service (IRS) on IRS Form 1099 as Miscellaneous Income.  On                 
          Schedule C of petitioners' 1990 Federal income tax return,                  
          petitioners did not report the $3,341 received from the                     
          corporation.  Petitioners reported gross receipts of $1,150 and,            
          from this amount, deducted $30,650 as cost of goods sold.  The              
          amount of the cost of goods sold was shown on Part III of                   
          Schedule C of petitioners' return as follows:                               


          2                                                                           
               At trial, respondent conceded that, for 1990, petitioners              
          are entitled, under sec. 63(f)(1), to the standard deduction                
          amount for joint filers where both spouses are age 65 or older,             
          rather than the basic standard deduction for joint filers.                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011