- 2 - After a concession by respondent, the issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioners failed to report miscellaneous income of $3,341 received from the Shaklee Corp. (the corporation) in 1990, and (2) whether petitioners are entitled to trade or business deductions under section 162 for cost of goods sold.2 Some of the facts were stipulated, and those facts, with the annexed exhibits, are so found and are incorporated herein by reference. At the time the petition was filed, petitioners' legal residence was Memphis, Tennessee. During 1990, Charles G. Vick (petitioner) was self-employed selling the products of the corporation. Petitioners received $3,341 from the corporation during 1990, and that amount was reported by the corporation as a payer to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on IRS Form 1099 as Miscellaneous Income. On Schedule C of petitioners' 1990 Federal income tax return, petitioners did not report the $3,341 received from the corporation. Petitioners reported gross receipts of $1,150 and, from this amount, deducted $30,650 as cost of goods sold. The amount of the cost of goods sold was shown on Part III of Schedule C of petitioners' return as follows: 2 At trial, respondent conceded that, for 1990, petitioners are entitled, under sec. 63(f)(1), to the standard deduction amount for joint filers where both spouses are age 65 or older, rather than the basic standard deduction for joint filers.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011