Anne S. and Charles G. Vick - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         

               With respect to the Schedule C deduction for cost of goods             
          sold, petitioner presented no documentary evidence to support the           
          claimed amount and testified he believed all of his records had             
          been stolen.  When questioned by the Court as to the possibility            
          of documenting the claimed expenditures through other sources,              
          such as records of purchases from the corporation, petitioner               
          stated that he had been unable to obtain such evidence.  Other              
          than his own self-serving statements, petitioner presented no               
          evidence to substantiate the disallowed deduction for cost of               
          goods sold.  Therefore, on this record, respondent's                        
          determination on the disallowance of the Schedule C deduction for           
          cost of goods sold is sustained.                                            


                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             under Rule 155.                          




















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  

Last modified: May 25, 2011