Orvil M. Weddel and Karen L. Weddel - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          then required to advise the sponsor of the existence of the CAP             
          Program and the possibility of using a closing agreement to avoid           
          plan disqualification.  In addition to retroactive and                      
          prospective correction of the plan under the CAP Program, the               
          party or parties to the closing agreement must agree to make a              
          nondeductible payment to the U.S. Treasury in order to avoid                
          having the plan’s qualified status revoked.  The maximum amount             
          to be paid under the CAP Program equals the total tax resulting             
          from (1) the disallowance of the plan sponsor’s deduction for               
          contributions to the plan, (2) the treatment of the plan’s trust            
          income as taxable income, and (3) the inclusion, in the gross               
          income of the participants, of their appropriate shares of plan             
          contributions as determined under the facts of the case.                    
               The EP agent in the instant case, who audited the Plan and             
          subsequently recommended and obtained its disqualification, did             
          not notify Ace or the Plan trustee of the CAP Program, did not              
          discuss the CAP Program with Ace or the Plan trustee, and did not           
          provide either with the option to utilize the program as an                 
          alternative to the Plan’s disqualification.  During examination             
          of the Plan, no significant operational defects existed that                
          would have prohibited the use of a closing agreement under the              
          terms of the CAP Program.                                                   
               There is no dispute in the instant case that Ace failed to             
          make amendments to the Plan in order to comply with changes in              
          the law resulting from TEFRA, DEFRA, and REA.  Thus, there is no            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011