- 10 - although it appears that he was compensated on other than an hourly basis. In the notice of deficiency respondent determined that petitioner received nonemployee compensation in the amount of $8,677 from a source not identified in the record. We assume that the source of such income was one of the above-mentioned employers and that the BLS adjustment reasonably approximates the amount of income earned from the other. At trial petitioner admitted that he received compensation from both employers, although he testified that with respect to each year, as far as he knew, he has never been self-employed. Given petitioner's poor recollection, his generalized testimony that he was never self-employed is insufficient to overcome the contrary presumption on the point, and in the absence of any evidence to rebut the reconstruction of his unreported income, including the use of BLS statistics, we find that all of the income attributable to petitioner for the year 1989 constitutes earnings from self-employment within the meaning of section 1402, subject to the tax imposed by section 1401. Accordingly, the deficiency determined by respondent for the year 1989 is sustained. 1990 Although not entirely free from doubt, it appears that petitioner's employment situation for 1990 was the same as 1989.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011