- 11 - Petitioner was no more specific about the income he earned in 1990 than he was with respect to 1989. In the notice of deficiency, in addition to an adjustment based upon BLS statistics, respondent determined that petitioner earned $6,792 in nonemployee compensation and had wage income in the amount of $5,729. The sources of the nonemployee compensation and wage income were not specifically identified, but petitioner did not specifically deny the receipt of such income. We assume that the sources of income were Tucson Newspapers, Inc., and Delivery Services, Inc. Having found petitioner to be a credible witness, we accept his contention that he had no other sources of income for the year 1990. We further find that the nonemployee compensation is subject to the self-employment tax imposed by section 1401. We reject the portion of respondent's adjustment that is based upon BLS statistics. 1991 Although the exact date is unknown, petitioner moved to St. George, Utah, in late 1990. After he moved to St. George, petitioner worked for Everex, Heritage, and Peppermill. Based upon his testimony we find that he earned the following income in connection with these jobs: Employer Amount Computation Everex $2,280 12 weeks x 40 hrs. per week x $4.75 per hr. Heritage 2,160 12 weeks x 40 hrs. per week x 4.50 per hr. Peppermill 2,640 12 weeks x 40 hrs. per week x 5.50 per hr.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011