Hyman S. and Gaile S. Zfass - Page 10

                                        -10-                                          
          petitioner’s testimony was vague; he merely recalled having asked           
          Freasier whether the investment “would fly”.  We believe this               
          inquiry was directed to whether the purported tax deductions “would         
          fly”, not whether the economics of the investment “would fly”.  We          
          are not convinced that Freasier possessed sufficient knowledge              
          about the nontax aspects of the partnership to give petitioner              
          competent advice.                                                           
               Petitioner compares his case to Mollen v. United States, 72            
          AFTR 2d 93-6443, 93-2 USTC par. 50,585 (D. Ariz. 1993), in which a          
          medical doctor who invested in one of the partnerships described in         
          Charlton v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-402, avoided the                  
          imposition of negligence penalties because of reliance on advisers.         
          Mollen is not binding herein.                                               
               In summary, petitioner failed to prove that any part of the            
          underpayment of his 1982 and 1983 taxes was due to reasonable               
          cause.  To the contrary, we hold that the entire underpayment of            
          taxes for both years was the result of petitioner’s negligence.             
          Accordingly, petitioner is liable for additions to tax under                
          section 6653(a)(1) and (2) for 1982 and 1983.                               
          Issue 2.  Valuation Overstatement                                           
               The second issue is whether petitioner is liable for additions         
          to tax under section 6659.  That section imposes an addition to tax         
          if an underpayment of tax of $1,000 or more is attributable to a            
          valuation overstatement.  Sec. 6659(a), (d).  A valuation                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011